<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Innovation and Rewarding Learning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jamieflinchbaugh.com/2009/10/innovation-and-rewarding-learning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jamieflinchbaugh.com/2009/10/innovation-and-rewarding-learning/</link>
	<description>on lean culture, transformational leadership, and entrepreneurial   excellence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 13:30:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Graban</title>
		<link>http://jamieflinchbaugh.com/2009/10/innovation-and-rewarding-learning/comment-page-1/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Graban</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 18:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamieflinchbaugh.com/2009/10/innovation-and-rewarding-learning/#comment-85</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s stupid risks that weren&#039;t thought out and there&#039;s calculated risks where the was a hypothesis before action. We have to coach people. Of course we shouldn&#039;t encourage action without thought.

From the ideal PDCA cycle, we can&#039;t just have &quot;D&quot; or &quot;DCA&quot; without P.

Of course, many organizations do nothing but &quot;P,&quot; which is bad too.

PDCJ = Plan Do Check Justify wouldn&#039;t be a good cycle either, eh? That&#039;s the cycle I was referring to...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s stupid risks that weren&#8217;t thought out and there&#8217;s calculated risks where the was a hypothesis before action. We have to coach people. Of course we shouldn&#8217;t encourage action without thought.</p>
<p>From the ideal PDCA cycle, we can&#8217;t just have &#8220;D&#8221; or &#8220;DCA&#8221; without P.</p>
<p>Of course, many organizations do nothing but &#8220;P,&#8221; which is bad too.</p>
<p>PDCJ = Plan Do Check Justify wouldn&#8217;t be a good cycle either, eh? That&#8217;s the cycle I was referring to&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie Flinchbaugh</title>
		<link>http://jamieflinchbaugh.com/2009/10/innovation-and-rewarding-learning/comment-page-1/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Flinchbaugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 11:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamieflinchbaugh.com/2009/10/innovation-and-rewarding-learning/#comment-83</guid>
		<description>It can&#039;t stand along as a behavior. Others have to be included. It depends on what you mean by reward. If I get $20 just for writing stuff down, that&#039;s a problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It can&#8217;t stand along as a behavior. Others have to be included. It depends on what you mean by reward. If I get $20 just for writing stuff down, that&#8217;s a problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Markovitz</title>
		<link>http://jamieflinchbaugh.com/2009/10/innovation-and-rewarding-learning/comment-page-1/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Markovitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamieflinchbaugh.com/2009/10/innovation-and-rewarding-learning/#comment-79</guid>
		<description>Good insight here, Jamie. I know of companies that reward employees for attempts &amp; effort at doing something differently, regardless of whether or not it succeeds. This can be dangerous: people could be motivated to simply try stuff, regardless of cost or likelihood of success. But it does encourage risk-taking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good insight here, Jamie. I know of companies that reward employees for attempts &amp; effort at doing something differently, regardless of whether or not it succeeds. This can be dangerous: people could be motivated to simply try stuff, regardless of cost or likelihood of success. But it does encourage risk-taking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

